The article is about a man in his early 60's that was homeless, and passed away. He spent his days helping others with their lives and problems at a New York Starbucks.

I didn't find the article very informative, personally I think it could've been better, however, I am the deffinition of an amateur journalist, so my views are probably going to be much different from others. I think it could've given off stronger feelings and would be better. I also think more information could've been given, because I was left very confused, but interested in finding out more.

What do they mean by where he held court?

How was he able to get money for breakfast?

Did others know he was homeless? Was it a known fact?

How long had he been going there?